These members of the Supreme Court have consistently voted for every side of case that helps criminals, corruption, and fraudsters, and hurts innocent people. The number of cases I could cite are extensive, but without getting technical, let me pose a couple of examples: who wins in the following:
1. Government officials involved in billion dollar fraud vs. an individual who discovered the fraud and was fired?
2. Investment banks who helped corporations swindle investors out of billions and billions of dollars vs. the investors?
3. Government officials who engaged in wiretapping without warrants as required by the 4th Amendment to the Constitution vs. individuals?
If you know anything about Scalia, Roberts, Alito, Thomas, and Kennedy, then you know that they all favored the FORMER rather than the LATTER. But does that make them evil lowlifes?
Orignal From: Are Scalia, Roberts, Alito, Thomas, and Kennedy evil lowlifes?
Post a Comment